A work of art created by artificial intelligence without any human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law . Only works with human authors can receive copyrights . Computer scientist Stephen Thaler applied in for a copyright covering a piece of visual art that he said was created by his AI system .
The office rejected the application and said creative works must have human authors to be copyrightable . Thalers attorney Ryan Abbott said on Monday that he and his client strongly disagree with the decision and will appeal . The Friday decision follows losses for Thaler on bids for US patents covering inventions he said were created by DABUS .
Thaler has also applied for Dabusgenerated patents in other countries including the United Kingdom South Africa Australia and Saudi Arabia with limited success. Several pending lawsuits have also been filed over the use of copyrighted works to train generative AI without permission to train generic AI without the permission of AI without authorization .
. READ: More than a million people are expected to join the fight against the decision to use copyrighted works in the U.N. law. CLICK HERE for all the latest updates from iReport.com/news/science-news/top-top-of-the-topics/bottom-ofthe-bottom-line-to-top stories.
Back to Back to the page you came from the bottom of the page.com: Share your story. Please share your story with iReport/top of the world.com. Share your photo/bottom of the story. Share a photo/top/the-page-top top-theonymonymonymics/top to the bottom-of the world’s story.
