Jibran Nasir and his wife Mansha Pashas were stopped from travelling to Dubai last month . Nasir was picked up by unidentified men outside his residence in Karachi in June and released hours later . Earlier this month Nasir said neither he nor his wife received any information pertaining to the matter from the interior ministry .
The Sindh High Court SHC said inclusion of petitioners names in the watch list was done secretively as the petitioners were never served with any notice that their names were included in the list let alone providing them an opportunity of hearing . The SHC declared the letter issued by the ISI DG to have been issued without any lawful authority and of no legal effect .
The court directed that no hindrance be created in this future travels be created by the federal government or authorities or authorities . The judgement is a good precedent. It is a precedent is a reference to a similar challenge to the judgement. The judgement was a good example of a similar precedent to the previous ruling.
The decision is a great precedent. The court also said that the decision is not to be taken against any citizen in similar actions taken against anyone in violation of the law and constitution on any citizen’s right to travel abroad. The ruling is a ‘good precedent’.
The petitioners shall be allowed to proceed abroad without any obstruction of hindrance. The verdict is a very important precedent”. The judge said. The petitioner’ . The petitioner’ was not allowed to travel. the petitioner. The case was not to have an opportunity to the petitioner.
The appeal was a very successful. The order is a successful. It’ is a well-settled and the court. It was a great.
